Mating and Pathogenicity of the Dominant Colletotrichum Species Associated with Anthracnose Disease of Mango
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anthracnose is one of the main diseases of mango, which seriously affects the yield and quality. Previous studies found that mango anthracnose in China involves at least 13 species of Colletotrichum. From mango with anthracnose symptoms samples, we previously obtained 134 strains from 13 species, and 26.0% were C. fructicola, while 27.6% were C. siamense, and 31.3% were C. asianum, with a few specimens for each of the remaining species. These three main species were used in intraspecific mating tests to assess sexual reproduction. The intraspecific mating tests revealed that C. fructicola and C. siamense readily produced ascospores, while C. asianum did not. From the 595 intraspecific crosses with 35 isolates of C. fructicola, 34 crosses were considered fertile. Among these, thirty single-ascospore isolates were chosen for pathogenicity testing and genetic variation analysis (ITS and ApMat loci). The results revealed that some progeny showed higher aggressiveness than their parents, while some progeny showed lower aggressiveness. Future tests are needed to assess the genetic basis of these aggressiveness differences. The results provide a scientific basis for further research on sexual reproduction and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum, which may allow for comprehensive disease prevention and control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".