MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415491740 · doi:10.1007/s00300-025-03417-2

Population structure and divergence time among East Greenland and West Greenland/Eastern Canadian Arctic narwhals, Monodon monoceros

2025· article· en· W4415491740 on OpenAlexaffabout
Xênia Moreira Lopes, Martine Bérubé, Kit M. Kovacs, Runé Dietz, Steven H. Ferguson, Mads Peter Heide‐Jørgensen, Christian Lydersen, Per J. Palsbøll

Bibliographic record

VenuePolar Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNorsk PolarinstituttConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoRijksuniversiteit Groningen
KeywordsArcticPopulationBeringiaDivergence (linguistics)OverexploitationSubsistence agricultureWhaling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The narwhal ( Monodon monoceros ) is an Arctic endemic odontocete that is particularly sensitive to climate change. Narwhals are also a key species in subsistence hunts in both Canada and Greenland. Understanding the genetic population structure is crucial to help management authorities set sustainable harvest quotas to avoid overexploitation of vulnerable narwhal groups. Additionally, estimates of population divergence times and their correlation with potential environmental drivers may be informative regarding the effects of environmental change. Herein, 2236 genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms from 40 narwhals were used to infer population structure and divergence times. Samples were collected in six localities, one in East Greenland, four in West Greenland and one in the Eastern Canadian Arctic. The highest degree of genetic differentiation was observed between narwhals from Kangertittivaq (East Greenland) and Tasiujaq (Eastern Canadian Arctic), with a θ of 0.021 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.014–0.028). While some locations in West Greenland also exhibited significant levels of differentiation (e.g., Uummannaq vs Qeqertarsuaq, θ = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.004–0.020), the East Greenland narwhals were most distinct based on both θ (varying from 0.01, 95% CI: 0–0.01 with Uummannaq to 0.021 95% CI: 0.014–0.028 with Tasiujaq) and clustering analyses. Our results are relevant to the management of narwhals in East Greenland, where current hunting levels are likely unsustainable. The divergence time estimated between East Greenland and West Greenland/Eastern Canadian Arctic suggests that narwhals in these two areas became separated during the Last Glacial Maximum, offering additional insight into the long-term population dynamics during climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolar BiologySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207