MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Molecular detection and genotyping of Porphyromonas Gingivalis directly from oral rinse: Implications for Periodontitis pathogenesis

2025· article· en· W4415494834 on OpenAlexaff
Zahraa F.S. Al-shamy, Israa Alshamy

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical and Therapeutics Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaqManGenotypingGenotypePeriodontitisPorphyromonas gingivalisChronic periodontitisPathogenesisEtiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porphyromonas gingivalis is a Gram-negative anaerobe implicated as a primary etiological agent in chronic periodontitis, characterized by progressive inflammation and degradation of periodontal structures. The bacterium's pathogenicity is closely associated with its expression of distinct fimbrial subunits encoded by the fimA gene, which serves as a pivotal marker for strain differentiation and genotyping. Profiling the distribution of fimA genotypes in clinical specimens is vital for elucidating the pathogen's role in the etiology and progression of periodontitis. In this study, we developed a highly sensitive and specific real-time PCR assay utilizing TaqMan probe technology for the direct detection and genotyping of P. gingivalis fimA variants in oral rinse samples. The assay was designed to investigate both the prevalence and distribution of the six fimA genotypes (I, Ib, II, III, IV, and V) among individuals with periodontitis compared to periodontally healthy controls. A cohort of 30 participants, comprising 12 healthy individuals and 18 patients diagnosed with periodontitis, provided oral rinse samples for analysis. The real-time PCR assay, employing genotype-specific primers and TaqMan probes, demonstrated robust performance in discriminating the six recognized fimA genotypes. The assay achieved a detection rate of 94.4% in periodontitis samples, accurately identifying all fimA genotypes directly from the oral rinse specimens. The most prevalent fimA genotype identified was Ib, occurring in 33.33% of the samples. This was followed by genotype II, with a frequency of 27.78%. Genotype IV was found in 16.67% of samples, and genotype I was present in 5.56% of samples. Additionally, 16.67% of the samples contained combinations of two fimA types, including II,Ib; II,III; and II,IV. Among these, genotype II was the most frequently detected in combination with other genotypes. The linear regression analysis yielded a slope of -3.42, corresponding to an amplification efficiency of 94.5%, underscoring the assay's precision and reliability. The data indicate a potential contributory role of fimA genotypes Ib and II in periodontitis pathogenesis, establishing the developed PCR assay as a valuable diagnostic and epidemiological tool for monitoring P. gingivalis in clinical settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedical and Therapeutics Letters→Same topicOral microbiology and periodontitis research→French-language works237,207→