MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415507599 · doi:10.1016/j.idm.2025.09.005

Travel-related importation risk of mpox from Hong Kong to Shenzhen in 2023: A modeling study

2025· article· en· W4415507599 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruohan Chen, Jia Wan, Dongfeng Kong, Cong Niu, Zengyang Shao, Chijun Zhang, Manlin Xu, Yuan Bai, Eric H. Y. Lau, Zhen Zhang, Zhanwei Du

Bibliographic record

VenueInfectious Disease Modelling · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicZoonotic diseases and public health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShenzhen Science and Technology Innovation ProgramInnovation and Technology CommissionNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)OutbreakTransmission (telecommunications)ChinaPopulationDisease surveillance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mpox, a viral zoonotic disease formerly known as monkeypox, has gained global attention following a multi-country outbreak in 2022-23, primarily linked to close intimate contact. In China, mpox cases surged in June 2023, with nearly a quarter of new cases concentrated in Guangdong Province, particularly Shenzhen. This study aimed to estimate the importation risk of mpox cases from Hong Kong to Shenzhen in 2023, utilizing cross-regional population mobility data from January to October 2023. The analysis focused on local transmission in Hong Kong and the probability of mpox importation into Shenzhen. Results revealed a significant importation risk, with over a 50 % chance of at least one travel-based mpox case from Hong Kong in June 2023. The study underscores the necessity of enhancing inbound surveillance for travelers from high mpox prevalence regions. It is suggested that regional governments implement tailored strategies, including enhanced surveillance and dynamic risk assessment for effective cross-border disease management, supported by robust monitoring and coordinated actions across jurisdictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInfectious Disease ModellingSame topicZoonotic diseases and public healthFrench-language works237,207