MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415513544 · doi:10.5376/tgg.2025.16.0011

Exploring Presence/Absence Variations in Barley for Agronomic Trait Improvement

2025· article· W4415513544 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenyu Yang, Chunxiang Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueTriticeae Genomics and Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomesticationHordeum vulgareTraitCropSelection (genetic algorithm)OrganismAdaptation (eye)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presence/absence variations (PAVs), a form of structural genomic variation, play a critical role in shaping phenotypic diversity in plants, including crop species like barley ( Hordeum vulgare ), which serves both as a globally important cereal crop and a model organism for genomic studies. In this review, we examined the molecular mechanisms underlying PAV formation, such as transposable element activity and large-scale deletions, and highlighted recent advances in technologies-including pangenome assemblies and high-throughput sequencing-that have enabled the comprehensive detection of PAVs. We further discussed the distribution patterns of PAVs among landraces, cultivars, and wild relatives of barley, emphasizing their evolutionary significance in domestication and adaptation. Functionally, PAVs were found to influence key agronomic traits such as disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, and yield-related characteristics. The integration of PAV knowledge into modern breeding programs was explored, with a focus on marker-assisted selection and pangenome-based strategies, including a case study on improving heat tolerance through PAV-informed breeding. Lastly, we considered the potential of combining PAV analysis with multi-omics data and phenotyping platforms, and the role of machine learning in modeling genotype-phenotype relationships. This study underscores the value of PAVs as a genomic resource for precision breeding and highlights future directions in expanding pangenomic datasets and developing breeder-friendly tools to facilitate their practical application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTriticeae Genomics and GeneticsSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207