MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415525652 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.22.25338569

Plasma proteomic signatures of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers and memory in clinically unimpaired older adults

2025· preprint· en· W4415525652 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra N. Trelle, Karly Alex Cody, Joseph R. Winer, Isha Sai, Divya Channappa, Jaime Mendiola, Abdulrahman A. Alrajhi, Keerthana Raghuraman, Sharon J. Sha, Edward N. Wilson, Tony Wyss‐Coray, Anthony D. Wagner, Holden T. Maecker, Elizabeth C. Mormino

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBiomarkerDiseaseFunction (biology)AbnormalityBiomarker discovery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Multianalyte plasma proteomic panels that can accurately detect initial AD pathology in preclinical populations and simultaneously measure related biological processes relevant for disease risk are critical for advancing early detection and prognosis. Methods Using the NULISAseq CNS panel, we measured plasma from 193 clinically unimpaired (CU) older adults enrolled in the Stanford Aging and Memory Study (SAMS). We evaluated correspondence of core AD-relevant biomarkers Aβ42, Aβ40, pTau217, pTau181, GFAP, NfL, Aβ42/Aβ40, and pTau217/Aβ42 measured using NULISAseq and established Lumipulse immunoassays. ROC curve analyses compared the accuracy of these biomarkers for detecting Lumipulse CSF Aβ-positivity across platforms. Linear models were applied across 124 NULISAseq proteins to examine associations with common AD risk factors, including age, female sex, and APOE- ε4, as well as with biomarkers CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and pTau181, 18F-PI2620 Tau PET, and memory. Fold change differences in NULISAseq proteins as a function of CSF Aβ (A+) and pTau181 (T+) status were examined using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results Moderate to high correlations were observed between NULISAseq and Lumipulse AD plasma biomarkers. Across platforms, plasma pTau217/Aβ42 exhibited the highest performance in discriminating CSF A+ (NULISAseq AUC: 0.940, 95%CI: 0.885-0.995; Lumipulse AUC: 0.907, 95%CI: 0.849-0.966). Age and sex were associated with differential expression of NULISAseq targets linked to neurodegeneration, microglial activation, and inflammation. CSF A+ was associated with fold change differences in Aβ42, pTau217, pTau231, pTau181, and GFAP, while CSF T+ was additionally associated with increases in TREM1, TIMP3, SAA1, and S100A12. When stratified by AT groups, A+T-exhibited lower Aβ42 and elevated pTau217 compared to A-T-, whereas A+T+ exhibited elevated pTau231 and pTau181 compared to A+T-. Temporal cortex tau was positively associated with NULISAseq pTau217, pTau231, pTau181, and pTau217/Aβ42. Memory function was negatively associated with pTau isoforms and PRDX6, YWHAZ, ENO2, ARSA, CHI3L1, CXCL8, and FCN2. These associations remained when controlling for pTau217 and restricting to A-CU, suggesting these targets may represent AD-independent biological pathways relevant for memory function. Conclusions NULISAseq immunoassay-based multiplexing accurately detects AD pathology among CU older adults and identifies multiple biological pathways related to early biomarker abnormality and memory function that may become dysregulated in preclinical AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→