MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415526100 · doi:10.1165/rcmb.2025-0308oc

Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor attenuates allergen-induced eosinophil migration and airway hyperresponsiveness

2025· article· en· W4415526100 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory S. Whitehead, Keiko Nakano, Christina L. Wilkinson, A. Patterson, Sandeep Upadhyay, Abdull J. Massri, Brian N. Papas, Artiom Gruzdev, Manas K. Ray, Hideki Nakano, Donald N. Cook

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsUrokinase receptorEosinophilPathogenesisEosinophiliaInflammationSensitizationAsthmaPlasminogen activatorAllergic inflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) is a membrane-bound protein that can contribute to the activation and mobilization of leukocytes and is present at increased levels in asthmatics. However, its role in allergic asthma remains poorly understood. METHODS: We used multiple mouse strains and different models of allergic airway disease to study the function of uPAR in the pathogenesis of this disease. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Plaur, the gene encoding uPAR, was rapidly induced following allergic sensitization through the airway and again following subsequent allergen challenge. Plaur-deficient mice displayed both increased numbers of eosinophils and heightened airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in multiple models of allergic asthma. Mice selectively lacking Plaur in eosinophils also had more robust eosinophilia than did wild-type (WT) mice, and eosinophils lacking Plaur displayed increased activity in an ex vivo assay of chemokine-dependent migration. However, those mice did not have increased AHR compared with WT mice. Conversely, although mice selectively lacking Plaur in lung epithelial cells did not have increased inflammation compared with WT mice, they displayed heightened AHR. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that uPAR controls both airway inflammation and AHR, but through distinct mechanisms. Targeting uPAR might have therapeutic potential for treating inflammation and AHR in asthma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular BiologySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207