MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415532659 · doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2025.106256

A prospective, multi-center, observational study of the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of Nusinersen in adult patients with spinal muscular atrophy

2025· article· en· W4415532659 on OpenAlexaff
Craig M. Zaidman, Crystal M. Proud, Bing Liao, Nassim Rad, Doreen Ho, M. L. Chu, Shafeeq Ladha, Thomas O. Crawford, Shakti Nayar, Angela Genge, Margaret W. Frey, Chad Heatwole, Daphne Lew

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuromuscular Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersBiogen
KeywordsSpinal muscular atrophySMA*Observational studyTolerabilityVital capacityAtrophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide, modulates pre-mRNA splicing to produce full length survival motor neuron protein in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). It was approved in the US for SMA in all ages based on evidence in children. In adults, studies of nusinersen rely on real-world observational data and show stability or small improvements over time. We performed a prospective, 30 month longitudinal, observational multi-center study of adults initiating nusinersen with SMA types II/III to examine its safety, tolerability, and effectiveness. 43 participants (20 female; 14 ambulatory; 3, 17, and 23 with 2, 3, and ≥4 SMN2 copies, respectively), mean (SD) age 37.1 (11.9) years) enrolled and completed baseline assessments. Serial assessments over 30 months showed small but not significant improvements in the six minute walk test (16.1 m), Revised Upper Limb Module (0.7), Revised Hammersmith Scale (0.8), maximal inspiratory (-2.6 cm H20) and expiratory pressure (12.3 cm H20). Muscle strength and forced vital capacity did not change. The patient reported outcome Total SMA-HI improved (-11 (95% CI: -17,-5); p < 0.001)). No new safety effects were identified. This study of nusinersen in adults with SMA demonstrates stability over time in contrast to the expected decline in untreated patients, with a favorable safety profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuromuscular DisordersSame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207