MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415533720 · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101691

Energy metabolism and ruminal fermentation of prolific ewes in response to scheduled increase, relative to lambing, of dietary energy source and concentration

2025· article· en· W4415533720 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Plante-Dubé, C Sylvestre, R Bourassa, P.H. Luimes, Pablo G. Toral, Sébastien Buczinski, F. Castonguay, R. Gervais

Bibliographic record

Venueanimal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsCegep de Saint HyacintheUniversité de MontréalUniversity of GuelphHôpital d'Youville de SherbrookeUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationUniversité Laval
KeywordsSilageNEFARumenDry matterCrossbreedEnergy sourceEnergy metabolismEnergy requirement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In late gestation, to prevent metabolic disorders in prolific ewes, energy intake must align with increased energy requirements to support the growth of multiple fetuses. The present study was conducted to evaluate if providing a high-concentrate diet as early as 4 compared with 2 weeks prepartum was more effective to meet the energy requirements of prolific breeds, and if corn silage could serve as a high-energy feed for late gestational ewes. Eight weeks prepartum, 48 mature F1 crossbred (Dorset × Romanov) ewes were offered grass-legume silage ad libitum. Four weeks later, ewes were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 isoenergetic dietary treatments: a grass-legume silage and ground corn-based total mixed ration (TMR) from week -4 (GC4; gradual increase from week -5) or week -2 (GC2; gradual increase from week -3) or a corn silage-based TMR from week -4 (CS4; gradual increase from week -5). Dry matter intake (DMI), body condition score (BCS), circulating beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), glucose, and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs) were monitored throughout the last 6 weeks of gestation. Rumen fluid was collected at week -2 to assess fermentation parameters. Inclusion of concentrates at 4 (GC4) compared with 2 weeks prepartum (GC2) resulted in greater DMI and metabolizable energy intake (MEI) from weeks -5 to -3. Overall, during the last 5 weeks of gestation, DMI and MEI of GC4 ewes were 12 and 20% higher compared with GC2, respectively. At week -4, circulating BHB concentrations were greater for GC4 compared with GC2, despite an improved energy balance, as confirmed by lower NEFA and greater glucose concentrations. Except for a decreased DMI and MEI at week -4, resulting in greater NEFA concentrations for CS4 compared with GC4, no other impact of energy source on intake or circulating NEFA and glucose was observed during the prepartum period. Compared with GC4, BHB concentrations were greater for CS4 from weeks -5 to -1. Rumen proportion of acetate decreased by 7%, whereas butyrate increased by 22% for CS4. The current experiment demonstrates that blood BHB concentration was affected by dam energy balance and ingredient composition of the diet. Our study also shows that a high-energy corn silage diet provided from 4 weeks prepartum can prevent the onset of a negative energy balance during late gestation, similar to adding ground corn to a grass-legume silage-based diet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueanimalSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207