MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415537345 · doi:10.1016/j.yjpso.2025.100236

Contemporary management of pectus excavatum: A survey of the members of the American pediatric surgical association

2025· article· en· W4415537345 on OpenAlexaff
Annamarie Lukish, Hae Sung Kang, Mark L. Kovler, Carolyn Gosztyla, Kibileri Williams, Christina Feng, Mikael Petrosyan, Timothy D. Kane, Anthony D. Sandler, Donald J. Lucas, Robert Baird, Afif N. Kulaylat, Rebeccah L. Brown, Fizan Abdullah, Seth D. Goldstein, Todd A. Ponsky, Jeffrey R. Lukish

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Surgery Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPectus excavatumRespondentNuss procedureIntervention (counseling)Pediatric SurgeonPediatric surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Widespread adoption and use of the Nuss procedure have led to numerous refinements and innovations in managing children with pectus excavatum (PE). Our aim in this project was to determine the common clinical and operative practices pediatric surgeons employ to care for children with PE. Additionally, we sought to identify opportunities to optimize current PE management strategies. A 28-question IRB-approved survey was administered electronically to all APSA members. The American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) outcomes committee sanctioned the survey content. 140 members responded to the survey. We received responses from members in 36 states, with 97% performing the Nuss procedure at either a children’s hospital or a children’s center within an adult hospital. Cryoablation is the most common pain management routine (84%), and a majority use a commercially available titanium system (60%). There is variability in the technical aspects of passing the bar, with a most common approach of right thoracoscopy with bar passage right-to-left (51%). Notably, 33% have adopted intermittent or synchronous use of bilateral thoracoscopy. Use of stabilizer plates is routine (81%). Only 56% limit activities until >12 weeks post-op, with a remainder offering more liberal return to activity. Complications experienced by the respondent or a partner included bar migration requiring reoperation (76%), hemorrhage during insertion requiring intervention (17%), and hemorrhage during removal requiring intervention (20%). The survey describes the contemporary pediatric surgeon practice patterns with respect to pectus excavatum correction, including workup, surgical indication, and the use of cryoablation. There is a wide variety of successful technical approaches. Allergy testing is not commonly used, and very few surgeons offer correction at younger than 12 years. Prolonged activity restrictions may be overly conservative. Bar migration and bleeding complications may be more common than the reported incidence. Collaborative opportunities to harmonize the factors surveyed may be indicated. IRB approval number: 00000654

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Surgery OpenSame topicPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207