MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S271 The Efficacy and Safety of Microbiome Modulating Agents Alongside Standard Management for Acute Pancreatitis: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

2025· article· en· W4415541117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patel Manthanbhai, Sudheer Dhoop, Hasan Al‐Obaidi, Nooraldin Merza, Ali Nawras, Muhammad Ali Ibrahim Kazi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute pancreatitisBacterial translocationRandomized controlled trialClinical endpointOdds ratioOddsMicrobiomeParenteral nutrition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Obese patients are at increased risk of developing severe acute pancreatitis (AP) with increased complication morbidities including pancreatic necrosis and intensive care unit admission. Bariatric surgery was reported to reduce mortality among AP patients in the United States inpatient database. We aimed to evaluate whether the benefit from prior bariatric surgery applies to a broader population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using de-identified TriNetX database, which includes data on over 179 million individuals globally, from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2025. Adult patients (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of AP and BMI ≥40 kg/m² were divided into 2 cohorts based on the presence or absence of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) history performed at least 6 months prior to AP diagnosis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to adjust for demographics and confounders. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the incidence of the primary outcome (mortality) and secondary outcomes, including acute renal failure, respiratory failure, necrotizing pancreatitis, sepsis, septic shock, and need for surgical drainage of pancreatic fluid collections at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after AP diagnosis, based on the revised Atlanta classification. Results: Among 2,798 patients with prior SG and RYGB and 47,999 without, PSM yielded 2,792 matched pairs. Patients with prior SG or RYGB were younger (mean age 51.1 ± 13 years vs 53.3 ± 16.5 years, P < 0.001) and more likely to be women (75% vs 59%, P < 0.001). After matching, patients with prior SG or RYGB had significantly lower odds of acute respiratory failure at 2 weeks (odds ratio 0.581, P = 0.002) and 1 month (odds ratio 0.623, P = 0.003). No significant differences were observed in mortality, acute kidney failure, or necrotizing pancreatitis at all time points. The rates of sepsis, septic shock, and mortality tended to be lower in the SG or RYGB group without statistical significance. Conclusion: History of SG or RYGB decreased the risk of acute respiratory failure among obese patients within 1-month post-AP diagnosis based on this large cohort analysis. These findings suggest the history of SG or RYGB may serve as a protective factor against systemic complications of AP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.032
Bibliometrics0.0160.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207