MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415546166 · doi:10.1016/j.geomat.2025.100080

Machine learning applied to remote sensing in the context of intertidal zone mapping: A literature review

2025· article· en· W4415546166 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrigo Borba dos Santos, Mario Luiz Mascagni, Karoline de Souza Guckert, Laís Pool da Silva Freitas, Anita Maria da Rocha Fernandes, Antonio Henrique da Fontoura Klein, Dennis Kerr Coelho

Bibliographic record

VenueGEOMATICA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa CatarinaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsIntertidal zoneGeneralizability theoryContext (archaeology)Hyperspectral imagingLidarRandom forestKey (lock)Digital elevation model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate digital elevation models for intertidal zones are essential for coastal management, yet traditional survey methods and models based on normalized index from remote sensing products often struggle to represent these dynamic environments. Recently, machine learning has emerged as a promising alternative for mapping intertidal morphology. This study systematically reviewed 60 articles using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and bibliometric analysis, focusing on machine learning applications for intertidal mapping. Among 19 identified machine learning models: U-Net (convolutional architecture) and Random Forest (decision tree architecture) delivered the most accurate results. Model performance was highly dependent on environmental characteristics; in general, wider tidal ranges reduced accuracy, while substrates with clearer spectral signatures improved it. Machine learning approaches consistently outperformed models without machine learning in representing complex coastal morphology. Most studies used open-source Landsat or Sentinel imagery; however, commercial satellites and high-resolution video cameras, though less common, significantly improved model performance. Validation strategies based on high-resolution data from active sensors such as LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) proved essential to assess the accuracy and reliability of predictions, especially in heterogeneous environments. This comprehensive review highlights not only the most effective model architecture but also key research gaps, such as the limited exploration of temporal dynamics, the underrepresentation of macrotidal settings, and the challenges of transferring models across regions. Future research should prioritize convolution-based architectures trained with multi-source, high-resolution datasets, integrate UAV and active sensor data for robust validation, and explore scalable solutions to enhance the generalizability of machine learning models for intertidal zone mapping. • First systematic bibliometric review on intertidal topographic inversion using remote sensing and ML models to generate intertidal DEMs. • Sixty peer-reviewed studies analyzed using PRISMA, with bibliometric mapping and model performance comparison (e.g., RMSE, accuracy). • Random Forest and U-Net models outperformed others especially when applied to high-resolution imagery and validated with high resolution in-situ data. • Environmental and methodological factors - including tidal regime, spatial scale, sensor resolution and bottom type affect model performance. • Provides practical guidance on model selection , dataset design, and validation, while identifying gaps in transferability and uncertainty handling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGEOMATICASame topicCoastal and Marine DynamicsFrench-language works237,207