MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415549550 · doi:10.1681/asn.2025jwgxetsk

RhoA and Its Downstream Effectors ROCK/Cofilin and Formin Trigger Mitochondrial Fragmentation in PKD

2025· article· en· W4415549550 on OpenAlexaff
András Kapùs, Rohankrishna Harikumar, Zsuzsanna Lichner, Chen Tuo, Kuiru Wei, Katalin Szászi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForminsDownstream (manufacturing)EffectorRHOAFragmentation (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is the most prevalent genetic renal disorder, caused by the loss/loss of function of polycistin-1 (PC1) or 2 (PC2), and characterized by excessive cyst formation and fibrosis. A key cellular feature of PKD is the fragmentation of mitochondria, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Our previous studies have shown that PC loss induces RhoA- dependent nuclear translocation of myocardin-related transcription factor, leading to fibrogenesis. Based on this scenario, we asked whether PC1/2 loss-induced mitochondrial fragmentation might also be a mediated by RhoA. Methods: Mitochondrial morphology was quantified by volumetric confocal microcopy in mitoRFP-transfected LLC-PK1 tubular cells. RhoA activity was measured by RhoA G-LISA. The manipulation of expression/activation of proteins is described at the corresponding results. Results: RhoA activation by constitutively active RhoA or RhoA II activator toxin induced robust mitochondrial fragmentation. Importantly, PC1 or PC2 silencing triggered RhoA activation and mitochondrial fragmentation, which was prevented/reversed by downregulation/inhibition of RhoA (siRNA, dominant negative (DN) RhoA, or C3 toxin). Fission was catalyzed by dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), as a) PC loss promoted RhoA-dependent mitochondrial Drp1 translocation; and b) fragmentation was prevented/reversed by Drp1 silencing or inhibition (mDivi or DN-Drp1). PC loss provoked cofilin phosphorylation (inhibition) via Rho kinase (ROCK) and its target LIM kinase. Inhibition of ROCK or LIMK reduced fragmentation. Mitochondrial fission also required the other major RhoA effector pathway, the activation of formins. Mitochondrially targeted active formins, like DIAPH3, but not its actin polymerization-deficient mutant induced fission, while the pan-formin inhibitor SMIFH2 abolished PC loss-provoked fragmentation. Importantly, the human PKD cell line WT 9-12 exhibited fragmented mitochondrial network, which was restored by SMIFH2. Fragmentation facilitated PC1/2 loss-induced fibrogenic gene expression. Conclusion: Thus, PC1/2 loss leads to mitochondrial fragmentation by activation of RhoA and its effectors, which promote F-actin polymerization by decreased severing (cofilin inhibition) and increased assembly (formin activation).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicMitochondrial Function and Pathology→French-language works237,207→