MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415565768 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116464

Retinal glia regulate development of the circadian photoentrainment circuit

2025· article· en· W4415565768 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas W. Brown, Noémie Vilallongue, Sarah C. Hales, Shashank Bangalore Srikanta, Pierre‐Luc Rochon, Aline Giselle Rangel Olguin, Adele Tufford, Jeremie Van Prooijen, Arjun Krishnaswamy, Nicolas Cermakian, Michel Cayouette

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCircadian rhythmIntrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cellsRetinalRetinaMuller gliaFunction (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circadian photoentrainment depends on intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), which convey environmental light information to the hypothalamus. While the anatomy and function of mature ipRGCs are well characterized, the mechanisms guiding their developmental integration into the circadian circuit remain unclear. Here, using transsynaptic rabies tracing in mice, we show that Müller glia are primary upstream partners of developing hypothalamus-projecting ipRGCs, suggesting a role for glia-neuron communication in the assembly of the photoentrainment pathway. We further show that disrupting SNARE function specifically in Müller glia during early postnatal development impairs ATP release, induces ipRGC hyper-responsiveness to light, and results in defective photoentrainment. In contrast, visual acuity and the pupillary light reflex, which are mediated by different RGC/ipRGC subtypes, remain unaffected. These results indicate a critical and circuit-specific role for Müller glia in shaping the development and function of the retinal pathway underlying circadian photoentrainment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicCircadian rhythm and melatoninFrench-language works237,207