MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415566205 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1668610

Efficacy of preoperative transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation in reducing postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4415566205 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Long Sun, Wenqing Ruan, Yinghua Zou, He Li, Yongqiang Wang, Xing Li, Jiangang Song

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaShanghai Municipal Health Commission
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialOrthopedic surgeryDeliriumClinical trialStimulationTraditional Chinese medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication. Pain and sleep disturbances may contribute to the development of postoperative delirium, while transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) can alleviate these symptoms. This study investigated the effect of preoperative TEAS on POD prevention in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Methods A total of 608 patients were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (TEAS group) or a placebo group (control group). The TEAS group received stimulation at bilateral Hegu–Neiguan and Zusanli–Taichong acupoints for three consecutive days prior to surgery. POD was assessed twice daily using the Confusion Assessment Method from postoperative day 1 through day 5. Sleep disturbances were evaluated using the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), and pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) on preoperative 3 days. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and S100β protein were quantified on postoperative days 1 and 3. In addition, cognitive function was evaluated on postoperative day 7 using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Results The incidence of POD was significantly lower in the TEAS group compared to the control group (6.08% vs. 17.57%, p < 0.001). Patients in the TEAS group also exhibited significantly lower serum levels of IL-6, CRP, and S100β on both postoperative days 1 and 3 ( p < 0.05). Furthermore, significant improvements were observed in preoperative AIS scores and VAS scores for pain on days 1 and 2 prior to surgery in the TEAS group compared to the control group ( p < 0.05). Besides, the MoCA score in the TEAS group was significantly higher than in the control group on postoperative day 7 ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Preoperative application of TEAS was associated with a reduced incidence of POD in older adults undergoing orthopedic surgery. The intervention may also contribute to improvements in preoperative sleep quality and pain reduction, as well as attenuation of postoperative inflammatory responses. Clinical trial registration The trial was prospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration No. ChiCTR-INR-17012951; October 12, 2017).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207