MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415569985 · doi:10.3390/healthcare13212699

Workplace Impact of Menopause Symptoms Among Canadian Women Physicians

2025· article· en· W4415569985 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shannon E. Brent, Lindsay Shirreff, Natalie Yanchar, Marie K. Christakis

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreMount Sinai HospitalCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenopauseWomen PhysiciansMEDLINENeeds assessmentAffect (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Menopause is a significant, universal hormonal transition, with symptoms impacting ~80% of women. Research shows that menopause can be professionally disruptive, contributing to decreased productivity, absenteeism, and early exit from the workplace. The objective of this study was to describe the landscape of menopause among Canadian women physicians and explore its potential impact on work performance, job satisfaction, and absenteeism. Methods: In this exploratory cross-sectional study, Canadian physicians self-identifying as women and peri-menopausal or menopausal were invited to participate in an online survey between May–September 2023. Demographic and practice characteristics data were collected. A modified Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) was used to quantify symptom burden. Qualitative data describing the menopausal experience were collected as well. Primary outcome was self-reported work performance. Secondary outcomes included perceived impact of menopause on promotional opportunities, absenteeism, and job satisfaction. Multivariable regression was used to examine associations between MRS scores and outcomes of interest. Results: Among 217 respondents, 47.7% reported a severe menopausal symptom burden; 40% felt menopause negatively impacted work performance, and 16.1% expressed job dissatisfaction. However, fewer than 10 respondents (4.6%) ever took time off for menopausal symptoms. Increasing MRS scores were significantly associated with negative perceived work performance (p < 0.001), fewer promotional opportunities (p < 0.001), and lower job satisfaction (p = 0.006) when controlling for confounders. Qualitative responses were provided by 43 participants, 6 of whom reported positive aspects of the menopausal transition, whereas 20 elaborated on the challenges. Conclusions: Canadian women physicians can experience severe menopausal symptoms, often without support. This needs assessment highlights an important occupational health issue and suggests that opportunities remain for medical institutions and employers to formally recognize and study this life stage of women physicians to improve well-being for this valuable workforce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.920

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcareSame topicMenopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207