MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415570943 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.11.014

TRAUMATIC VOLAR CARPAL INSTABILITY NON-DISSOCIATIVE: A CASE SERIES

2025· article· en· W4415570943 on OpenAlexaff
Teng Li, Matthew J. Furey, Armin Badre

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWristLigamentUlnar deviationRange of motionDeformitySagittal planeFixation (population genetics)Reduction (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Post-traumatic carpal instability non-dissociative (CINDT) occurs from injury to extrinsic and intrinsic wrist ligaments that result in disruption of the relationship between carpal rows. CINDT has been previously reported in association with distal radius fractures, radiocarpal fracture-dislocations, scaphoid fractures, and capsular and/or ligamentous wrist injuries. Previous series report treatment of acute CINDT with ligament repair and delayed CINDT with ligament reconstruction or wrist fusion, with poor outcomes with delayed diagnosis. We present two cases of CINDT-volar intercalated segmental instability (VISI) following Galeazzi injuries with a novel approach in their management. We identified two adolescent patients with CINDT-VISI after Galeazzi fracture with the entire proximal carpal row rotated into flexion with radiolunate angles of greater than 15°. We performed a retrospective chart review for baseline demographics, injury characteristics, treatment course, and clinical outcomes. Radiolunate angles measurements were performed on all sagittal radiographs. Two 14-year-old males sustained closed, isolated, neurovascularly intact Galeazzi injury pattern from falling off a pedal bicycle. Both underwent open reduction and internal fixation of the radius with volar locked plating, pinning of the displaced physeal ulnar head/neck fracture, and pinning of the distal radioulnar joint, and were noted to have CINDT-VISI within two weeks postoperatively. The first patient progressed to a fixed CINDT-VISI deformity with a radiolunate angle of 63.8° by six months. Despite a course of physiotherapy, he had significant limitations in range of motion (25° wrist extension and 65° flexion). Magnetic resonance arthrography showed extensive intraarticular adhesions and volar capsular contracture with dorsal radiocarpal ligament disruption but no intrinsic wrist ligament injury. Seven months postoperatively, he underwent arthroscopic debridement of intraarticular adhesions, removal of the volar locking plate with volar capsular release, and manipulation under anesthesia restored carpal alignment to within normal range, which was maintained with pinning of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints for eight weeks. At 20 months follow-up, his radiolunate angle was 18.3° with improved range of motion (70° extension and 70° flexion) and no functional limitations other than doing push-ups. The second patient progressed to a radiolunate angle of 40.4° at five weeks postoperatively. He was successfully treated with early aggressive physiotherapy with a radiolunate angle of 19.1° and excellent range of motion (90° extension and 95° flexion) with no functional limitations at one-year follow-up. This is the first report of CINDT-VISI associated with Galeazzi fractures. In previous cases series, patients with fixed CINDT have undergone salvage operation with partial wrist fusion. In our first case, we elected for a soft tissue procedure rather than a salvage arthrodesis given our patient's young age. Based on these two cases and our experience with other CINDT injuries associated with distal radius fractures, our management algorithm includes early aggressive therapy, as early as possible depending on the injury, to allow functional range of motion. If operative intervention is required, careful soft tissue releases with or without ligament repair/reconstruction should be considered even in delayed cases or those with fixed deformity, particularly in younger patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207