MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415570984 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.11.001

THE IMPACT OF SURGERY ON PAIN IN DEGENERATIVE CERVICAL MYELOPATHY: A POOLED ANALYSIS OF 1,047 PATIENTS FROM CSM-NA, CSM-I, AND CSM-PROTECT TRIALS

2025· article· en· W4415570984 on OpenAlexaff
Aneta Bąk, Ali Moghaddamjou, Muhammad Alvi, James S. Harrop, Paul M. Arnold, Michael G. Fehlings

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogistic regressionPooled analysisMultinomial logistic regressionQuality of life (healthcare)Neck painMinimal clinically important differenceDepression (economics)MyelopathyPain scoreChronic pain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pain is a significant contributor to quality of life in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). However, its trajectory and factors associated with prolonged chronic pain and resolution is poorly understood. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of surgery on pain in DCM over 12 months. DCM patients with severe pain were queried using a harmonized dataset of the AOSpine CSM-North America, CSM-International, and CSM-Protect clinical trials. Severe acute pain was characterized as a Neck Disability Index pain intensity (NDI-PI) score of 3 or greater. Latent class trajectory modelling (LCTM) was applied to classify patients into distinct trajectories based on their NDI-PI score over the initial 12 months postinjury. Predictors of recovery trajectories were identified using descriptive statistics and multinomial logistic regression with relative risk ratios (RRR) on demographic and surgical variables. From a total of 1,047 patients, three distinct recovery trajectories were discovered from our analysis of 305 patients with severe baseline pain (29.1%). Their parabolic course was classified as: 1) complete resolution of pain (n=134, 43.9%), 2) Recovery to moderate pain (n=105, 34.4%), and 3) marginal recovery (n=72, 23.6%). In patients with severe baseline pain, older age, being married, and higher baseline Nurick and mJOA scores were associated with complete resolution. Anxiety and depression were inversely associated with complete resolution. Surgically, complete pain resolution was associated with anterior autograft with autograft, cage, and allograft. Posterior autograft was inversely associated with complete resolution. Severe acute pain can be classified into one of three distinct subpopulations with fundamentally differing clinical courses. There is greater than 50% of unresolved chronic in DCM patients presenting with severe acute pain over the course of 12 months. Given the high prevalence of chronic pain and impact to quality of life, factors associated with pain trajectories may be avenues for futures comparative studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyFrench-language works237,207