SpiritualCapital as Integral to Rural Church Viability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The decline and closure of rural churches in Canada has continued for decades. This condition mirrors the struggles of local rural communities to be sustainable in an ever-changing world, but also presents an opportunity for rural organizations to do things differently with positive, measurable outcomes. This paper examines the role, and possible necessity, of spiritual capital in the viability of rural church by presenting a case study of one Alberta parish. Spiritual capital, religious capital and secular spiritual capital offer specific and contextualized forms of social capital. As a foundational asset to rural church members and congregations, spiritual capital has the potential to promote relationships of trust and reciprocity in the larger community, creating the capacity for both growth and sustainability. Beginning from this premise, this project focuses on the Anglican Mission of St. Saviour which began in May 2014 as a year round parish to serve the roughly 700 people of the village of Wabamun, Alberta. Through everyday interactions, participation in community events, volunteering, and special church functions, this rural congregation exercises spiritual capital by being a helpful, listening, prayerful and supportive presence among those they serve. A critical element has been an innovative understanding of a church as an action verb grounded in the development of spiritual capital. Drawing from observational and congregational data, this project presents an innovative perspective on both faith and the role of faith-based organizations in rural development, the importance of spiritual capital, and a hands-on account of new ideas and inspiration to challenge and encourage the importance of faith in rural communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".