Past and Present Informing the Future: A Case Study of Cultural Heritage Tourism in Louisbourg, NS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The importance of leveraging Cultural Heritage for the sake of knowledge preservation and exploration into the tourism sector cannot be understated. The Fortress of Louisbourg is an excellent example of rural tourism, as it continues to attract tourists from across Canada and beyond despite its remote location on Cape Breton Island. The Fortress was first declared a National Historic Site in 1928, but the partial reconstruction of this French Fortress is what attracted tourists to this municipality in the 1960s. In 2017, Dr. Amy Scott from the University of New Brunswick, in partnership with Parks Canada, established a bioarchaeological field school at Louisbourg to address ongoing coastal erosion, allowing students to build their bioarchaeological skills. Secondarily, ongoing bioarchaeological excavations have been supported and highlighted by Parks Canada to enhance the overall tourist experience. Throughout the 2023 bioarchaeological field season, surveys were administered to 30 tourists inquiring about their Fortress experience, and interests and values as tourists in Canada. Of these 30 guests, 96.7% indicated it was important for people traveling in Canada to visit Cultural Heritage sites, like the Fortress. These research findings exemplify how investments into local Cultural Heritage may provide communities opportunities to enhance economic development through tourism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".