MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415586839 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01453

ReMLP-NET: A Neural Network Interaction Potential for Molecular Energy Prediction

2025· article· en· W4415586839 on OpenAlexafffund
Omid Tarkhaneh, Sharene D. Bungay, Robert C. Mawhinney, Raymond A. Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsHyperparameterArtificial neural networkEnergy (signal processing)Feature (linguistics)Mean squared errorPerceptronMultilayer perceptronFunction (biology)Pattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning methods have seen increased applications and are now regularly used in chemistry, biology, and related areas. In chemical applications, they are used as an alternative to quantum mechanics (QM) methods to predict molecular energy with a more reasonable computational time. Here, we utilize a machine learning algorithm to predict the molecular total energy of structures containing elements H, C, N, O, F, S, and Cl. Optimized structures and total energies from the Retrievium repository, which includes molecules from the GDB13 and DUD-E sets, were used to train and assess a single Retrievium multilayer perceptron neural network (ReMLP-NET) using an atomic environment vector as the feature set. Symmetry function hyperparameters were selected using a Genetic Algorithm. The proposed method showed improved performance with MAE and root mean squared error values of 1.29 and 1.81 kcal/mol, respectively, compared to 1.53 and 2.16 kcal/mol for ReANI-2x.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Theory and ComputationSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207