MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415588229 · doi:10.1101/2025.10.24.25338728

Trying to Heal Without “Bringing Problems”: Navigating Cervical Precancer Stigma in a Phase I Clinical Trial in Western Kenya

2025· preprint· en· W4415588229 on OpenAlexaff
Anagha Guliam, Annum Sadana, Elizabeth Opiyo, Felix Adundo, Katherine Sorgi, Erum Agha, Chemtai Mungo

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical trialStigma (botany)AbstinenceSocial stigmaMental illnessCervical cancerPopulationSexual abstinence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Sociocultural barriers including stigma significantly influence women's decisions around screening and treatment. Objective: To explore how stigma influences women's experiences with cervical precancer care in the context of emerging self-administered topical therapies. Design: A qualitative approach using convenience sampling. Methods: Seventeen in-depth interviews were conducted between 2024 and 2025 in Kisumu, Kenya, with women who had been diagnosed with cervical precancer. Participants were recruited to self-administer intravaginal artesunate in a Phase I clinical trial, and interviews explored their experiences. Thematic analysis was conducted using the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework. Results: All women discussed experiences indicative of enacted, anticipated, and internalized stigmas related to partner blame, disclosure, and imagining the diagnosis as an imminent death sentence. These stigmas were driven and facilitated by poverty and limited health care access, embarrassment around sexual health, community fears of cervical cancer death, patriarchal norms, and cervical precancer's disproportionate burden on women. Women with cervical precancer feel "marked" by medication usage, clinic visits, community expectations of a "cancer" appearance, or painful sexual intercourse. By exercising relational autonomy, women in this trial were able to navigate stigmas around sexual health and overcome the debilitating fear of death. They were ultimately able to complete the self-administered artesunate treatment course and initiate conversations in their communities to address stigmas around cervical precancer treatment. Nevertheless, stigmas caused delays to screening and treatment among some participants, while others experienced intimate partner violence or conflict during artesunate treatment. Conclusion: Stigmas around cervical precancer, artesunate usage, and abstinence requirements can deeply impact women's social experiences, intimate partnerships, and mental health. Future trials of self-administered therapies should integrate stigma reduction strategies developed in collaboration with participants and survivors.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06165614, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06165614.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCervical Cancer and HPV Research→French-language works237,207→