MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415591409 · doi:10.1177/10538127251387392

Investigation of knee joint position sensation balance reaction time and function in individuals with knee osteoarthritis and unilateral total knee arthroplasty

2025· article· en· W4415591409 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ayşe Nihal Yurttaş, Ayça Aracı, Özlem Akkoyun Sert, Toghrul Ismayılov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisBalance (ability)Knee JointProprioceptionSensationBerg Balance ScaleTimed Up and Go test

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the joint position sense of individuals diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis (OA), unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee OA and healthy individuals and to examine the effect of joint position sense (JPS) on balance, physical performance, reaction time, kinesiophobia, pain stiffness and function. Method Sixty participants (n = 20 per group) were assessed using the RateFastGonio ® app for JPS at 15°, 45°, and 60°, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for balance, the Nelson Foot Reaction Test for reaction time, time up and go (TUG) and Stair Climb Up and Down Test (SCUDT) for physical performance, the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia, and the The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for pain, stiffness, and physical capacity. Results The results revealed no statistically significant differences in JPS and reaction time across the three groups (p > 0.05). However, balance scores were significantly higher in healthy individuals compared to the OA and TKA groups (p < 0.05). Physical performance scores (TUG and SCUDT) were significantly better in the healthy group, with OA patients performing better than the TKA group (p < 0.05). Kinesiophobia, pain, stiffness, and functional impairment were all significantly lower in healthy participants (p < 0.05). While JPS values were not significantly correlated with most variables, a moderate, positive correlation was observed between JPS at 60° and reaction time in the OA group, and between JPS at 15° and TUG results in the healthy and OA groups. Conclusion In conclusion, both TKA and OA negatively impact balance and physical performance and contribute to movement related fear. Although TKA affects JPS, it does not appear to enhance it. These findings highlight the need for preventive and rehabilitative interventions, including proprioceptive training, particularly given the growing elderly population. Clinical Trial registration The study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT05965765; Date: 07/20/2023).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Back and Musculoskeletal RehabilitationSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207