MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415599066 · doi:10.5833/jjgs.2024.0088

A Case of Multiple Intra-Abdominal Abscesses Due to Remnant Gallstones during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2025· article· en· W4415599066 on OpenAlex
Kohei Okamoto, Yoichi Miyata, Rieko Yamamoto, Keigo Tani, Motoki Nagai, Yukihiro Nomura

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiliary and Gastrointestinal Fistulas
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaparoscopic cholecystectomyGallstonesCholecystectomyGallbladderLaparoscopic surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

腹腔鏡下胆囊摘出術(laparoscopic cholecystectomy;以下,LCと略記)施行時の,腹腔内の落下結石の遺残による膿瘍形成は注意すべき合併症の一つである.今回,我々はLC時の遺残結石により,腹腔内多発膿瘍を形成し治療に難渋した1例を経験したので報告する.症例は81歳の女性で,コントロール不良の糖尿病を合併しており,LC施行時に小結石が落下し可及的に回収した.術後2か月後に右側腹部痛を主訴に来院し,遺残結石を核とした腹腔内多発膿瘍を認めた.当初は保存加療を行ったが,治療抵抗性であり開腹結石除去,洗浄ドレナージを施行した.しかし,結石の完全除去は困難であり,腹腔内膿瘍の再燃を認めたため再ドレナージを要した.再手術後8か月後に画像上膿瘍の消失を確認でき,再手術後12か月の時点で膿瘍の再燃なく外来で経過観察中である.LC時に結石が落下し遺残した場合,特に膿瘍形成のリスクが高い症例では治療に難渋することもあり,初回手術時に落下結石の完全除去が重要である.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it