MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415599907 · doi:10.1055/a-2716-4034

Percutaneous Screw Fixation vs. Casting for Non-Displaced or Minimally Displaced Scaphoid Waist Fractures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2025· article· en· W4415599907 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Volfson, Ahmad Essa, Ryan Paul, Andrea Chan, Kevin J. Zuo, Shawn Khan, Jonathan Persitz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wrist Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialConfidence intervalPercutaneousRelative riskNonunionFixation (population genetics)Grip strength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The optimal treatment for non-displaced scaphoid waist fractures remains uncertain. This meta-analysis examined whether percutaneous screw fixation offers improved clinical and functional outcomes compared with cast immobilization, while also evaluating safety and the need for secondary procedures. A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Cochrane databases was conducted through May 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing percutaneous or mini-open screw fixation to cast immobilization in adults with non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures were included. Six trials (n = 639; 315 surgical and 324 nonsurgical) met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes were pooled using random-effects models when substantial heterogeneity was present; otherwise, a fixed-effect model was applied. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool, and certainty of evidence was graded with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Percutaneous screw fixation was associated with a lower risk of nonunion (1.6% vs. 7.1%; risk ratio [RR] 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09–0.57; p = 0.002; I 2 = 33.4%), faster time to union (mean difference −3.8 weeks; 95% CI: −5.20 to −2.44; p < 0.001), and earlier return to work (mean difference −5.3 weeks; 95% CI: −7.95 to −2.57; p < 0.001) compared with casting. Grip strength was higher (mean difference +2.2 kg; 95% CI: +2.06 to +2.36; p < 0.001), and immobilization duration was shorter (0.5 vs. 8.3 weeks; p < 0.001) with surgery. Secondary surgical intervention was less common in the fixation group (3.2% vs. 7.4%; RR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.21–0.86; p = 0.02), with similar complication rates between groups. Percutaneous screw fixation yields favorable short-term outcomes compared with cast immobilization in adults with non-displaced or minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures. These findings support its use in appropriately selected patients, while highlighting the need for standardized imaging and follow-up protocols and further study of long-term outcomes. Level I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.123
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (broad)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.123
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.017
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wrist SurgerySame topicOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207