MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415604768 · doi:10.36456/27jahz36

Analisis Perubahan Pola Persebaran Permukiman di Negeri Ureng Kecamatan Leihitu

2025· article· W4415604768 on OpenAlexaff
W. D. Nanlohy, Arafat Aulia Huath, Adnan Affan Akbar Botanri

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Plano Buana · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pentingnya pola permukiman dalam kehidupan manusia dalam berbagai aspek tidak dapat diabaikan begitu saja. Pemahaman dan pemahaman yang baik mengenai permukiman dapat meningkatkan kualitas hidup, pengelolaan sumber daya lingkungan, dan pembangunan ekonomi. Negeri Ureng merupakan salah satu Negeri adat yang memiliki pola permukiman berdasarkan Marga. Namun, seiring dengan berjalannya waktu pola permukiman Negeri Ureng mulai mengikuti administrasi dan tidak lagi berdasarkan pada batas tanah marga. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perubahan pola persebaran permukiman di Negeri Ureng Kecamatan Leihitu. Metode yang digunakan adalah Analisis Pemetaan Partisipasi dan Analisis NNA. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Perubahan Pola Permukiman di Negeri Ureng diawali dengan masuknya Masyarakat Buton di tahun 2006-2010 yang kemudian melakukan jual beli tanah dengaan masyarakat Negeri Ureng untuk mendapatkan tempat tinggal, Perubahan ini mengakibatkan pola Permukiman yang awalnya berdasarkan pada Batas Tanah Marga kini di bagi menjadi 5 RT dan 3 Dusun salah satunya Dusun Waepula

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Plano BuanaSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207