Arahan Pengembangan Alun-Alun Bondowoso Sebagai Ruang Terbuka Publik Berkualitas di Kabupaten Bondowoso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ruang terbuka publik dianggap berkualitas apabila masyarakat memanfaatkan dan memperoleh kepuasan setelah melakukan aktivitas di kawasan tersebut. Alun-alun Bondowoso merupakan salah satu bentuk ruang terbuka hijau publik yang dikelola oleh pemerintah Kabupaten Bondowoso. Namun, keberadaan alun-alun tersebut masih terdapat keterbatasan dalam memnuhi kegiatan masyarakat. Terdapat permasalahan diantaranya adalah tidak terdapat daya tarik baru serta perawatan fasilitas masih dinilai kurang. Dilakukannya penelitian ini agar mengetahui kondisi eksisting serta mengetahui tingkat kepentingan dan tingkat kinerja komponen kualitas berdasarkan persepsi pengunjung yang dapat digunakan untuk penetuan prioritas pengembangan. Tujuan penelitian ini dapat dicapai dengan menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif dan Importance Performance Analysis. Hasil peneltian diperoleh bahwa Alun-alun Bondowoso dinyakatan berkualitas rendah dengan nilai tingkat kesesuaian 65,79% . Pada akhir analisis terdapat 7 prioritas pengembangan yaitu terdapat di kuadran 1 analisis IPA. Prioritas pengembangan yang didapatkan menjadi fokus utama pengembangan Alun-alun Bondowoso sebagai ruang terbuka publik berkualitas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".