Gastrointestinal morbidity in children whose mothers have anorexia nervosa: A longitudinal cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anorexia nervosa has potential to influence the development and function of the gastrointestinal system. We assessed the association between maternal anorexia nervosa and risk of gastrointestinal morbidity in offspring. METHODS: We analyzed a longitudinal cohort of 1,269,370 children born in Quebec, Canada, between 2006 and 2022. The exposure was maternal anorexia nervosa. The outcome was hospitalization for pediatric gastrointestinal disorders, including hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and other digestive morbidity. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 17 years. We used adjusted Cox regression models to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between maternal anorexia nervosa and pediatric gastrointestinal disorders. RESULTS: A total of 2,447 children (0.2%) had a mother with anorexia nervosa. By age 17 years, the cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal disorders was higher among children whose mothers had anorexia nervosa than other children (165.7 vs. 129.4 per 1,000). Compared with no anorexia, maternal anorexia nervosa was associated with a greater risk of any childhood gastrointestinal disorder (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.26-1.61), particularly hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.35-4.66), inflammatory bowel disease (HR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.67-3.64), and rectal hemorrhage (HR: 3.46, 95% CI: 1.97-6.09). Children whose mothers developed anorexia nervosa after age 20 years or were hospitalized more than once for anorexia had the greatest risk of gastrointestinal morbidity. The associations were not explained by digestive birth defects. CONCLUSION: Maternal anorexia nervosa is associated with pediatric gastrointestinal disorders that could potentially be mitigated with psychosocial support, nutritional rehabilitation, and breastfeeding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".