MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415613941 · doi:10.1177/00031348251393930

Incidence and Outcomes of Metastatic Patterns of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

2025· article· en· W4415613941 on OpenAlex
Sachin Patil, Vijay K. Mittal, Michael J. Jacobs

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Surgeon · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)LymphLungMetastasisStage (stratigraphy)AdenocarcinomaProstateSurvival rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is considered one of the most aggressive malignancies, with approximately 90% of patients presenting with advanced disease. Despite advances in the treatment therapies over the last 30 years, the 5-year survival rate for Stage IV disease is approximately 3%. Understanding patterns of metastatic burden may refine staging and guide treatment goals and outcomes. This study evaluates metastatic distribution and site-specific survival among patients with PDAC using a large, recent nationwide cohort. Methods Data on all patients with metastatic PDAC were abstracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (1998-2018). Patterns of metastases were identified using ICD-9 codes. Sites and rates of metastatic patterns were recorded. Standard statistical methods were used, and binary logistic regression was performed to assess the influence of metastatic site(s) on mortality. Results In total, 119,620 patients were analyzed with a diagnosis of metastatic PDAC. The most common sites of metastases included liver (31%), regional abdominal lymph nodes (10%), peritoneum (8.5%), and respiratory tract (6%). The small intestine (4.1%) was more frequently involved than the large intestine (0.9%). The least common nodal site was the axillary nodes (0.05%). Less than 1% of patients had metastases in the head/neck and pelvic lymph nodes (0.2%), thoracic and mediastinal nodes (0.5%), or inguinal nodes (0.5%). Bone metastases (2.4%) were more common than ovarian (0.2%), renal (0.3%), and adrenal (0.7%) metastases. Brain metastases occurred in 0.4% of patients, and skin (0.1%) and CNS not otherwise classified (0.1%) were rarely involved. Metastases to lung (OR = 1.5), liver (OR = 1.7), brain and spinal cord (OR = 1.8), and bone (OR = 1.3), and presence of malignant ascites (OR = 2.03) independently influenced mortality, P = 0.01. Conclusion Based on NIS data, PDAC predominantly metastasizes to the liver, regional nodes, peritoneum, lung, and small intestine. Metastases to atypical sites are rare and suggest advanced burden of disease. Mortality was independently influenced by metastases to lung, liver, brain and spinal cord, bone, and peritoneum. Increased knowledge of metastatic patterns and site-specific survival may help guide decision-making regarding the treatment plan in terms of palliative care or adjuvant therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it