The Application and Challenges of Emerging Technologies in Supply Chain Risk Management: A Case Study Based on Manufacturing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the VUCA era, supply chain disruptions are increasingly frequent and severe, posing significant challenges to global manufacturing industries. This study investigates the application and challenges of emerging technologies, particularly digital twin (DT) technology, in supply chain risk management through a qualitative case study approach. Focusing on six manufacturing enterprises, three of which have deployed DT and three still rely on traditional models, this research aims to reveal the practical effectiveness and implementation obstacles of DT technology in risk identification, assessment, and response stages. Traditional risk management methods, often based on periodic assessments and static contingency plans, have proven inadequate in addressing sudden global crises, as exemplified by the 2023 Red Sea crisis's impact on the European automotive industry. This study employs document analysis of enterprise risk reports, audit records, and emergency response plans to demonstrate how DT technology can transform risk management into a proactive, predictive strategy. The findings show that DT technology enhances supply chain resilience by enabling real-time risk perception, dynamic simulation, and automated response. However, the adoption of DT technology also faces challenges such as organizational division, financial barriers, and human resistance to change. This research provides actionable guidelines for enterprises to navigate the complex path of digital transformation and offers a low-tech threshold risk management upgrade path, especially for small and medium-sized manufacturers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".