Effects of Bacillus coagulans (GBI-30, 6086) Supplementation on the Fecal Characteristics and Microbiota of Healthy Adult Dogs Subjected to an Abrupt Diet Change
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies in humans and livestock have demonstrated Bacillus coagulans GBI-30, 6086 to have probiotic potential, suggesting that it may alleviate gastrointestinal (GI) distress commonly associated with diet change in dogs. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of B. coagulans GBI-30, 6086 on fecal scores, pH, dry matter (DM) percentage, and microbiota populations of dogs following an abrupt diet change. English Pointer dogs (n = 12; age = 5.9 ± 2.5 yr; body weight = 26.6 ± 6.1 kg) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design and fed commercial diets containing no probiotics or prebiotics. The following treatments were administered orally in gelatin capsules before each daily feeding: (1) placebo control (250 mg maltodextrin/day); (2) B. coagulans [low dose; 5 × 108 colony-forming units (CFU)/day]; and (3) B. coagulans (high dose; 2.5 × 109 CFU/day). An extruded kibble diet was fed for 28 days. Dogs were then abruptly switched to a canned diet and fed for 14 days, with fecal samples collected before and 2, 6, 10, and 14 days after diet change. All data were analyzed using the Mixed Models procedure of SAS 9.4, testing the effects of treatment, time, and treatment*time interactions. Treatment*time interactions were not observed, but the abrupt diet change reduced (p < 0.0001) fecal DM content, increased (p < 0.0001) fecal scores and pH, and reduced (p < 0.0001) fecal bacterial species richness and phylogenetic diversity. Diet change also increased (p < 0.001) fecal Bacteroidota, Fusobacteriota, and Proteobacteria, decreased (p < 0.001) fecal Firmicutes, and altered ~40 fecal bacterial genera relative abundances. Diet-induced changes were minimally impacted by B. coagulans, but fecal scores tended to be lower (i.e., firmer stools; p < 0.10), fecal E. coli and Faecalibacterium abundances were greater (p < 0.05), and fecal bacterial phylogenetic diversity was higher (p < 0.05) in dogs supplemented with the low dose than in controls. Our results demonstrate that abruptly transitioning dogs from a kibble to a canned diet negatively influences fecal characteristics and considerably shifts the composition of the fecal microbiota. Supplementation with B. coagulans did not mitigate the diet-induced shifts to fecal characteristics and most of the microbial taxa, although the low dose impacted some microbial taxa. Further investigation into optimal inclusion levels in pet foods is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".