The Parent-Child Relationship and Child Development in the Context of Historical and Complex Traumas : Perceptions of the Inuit Community of Kangiqsualujjuaq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the community of Kangiqsualujjuaq, as elsewhere in Nunavik, the socioeconomic conditions in which Inuit families live are much more difficult than those in the rest of Canada. These conditions are a symptom of a colonial past that has resulted in many historical and complex traumas. In a traumatic context, mentalization capacity, which refers to the ability to interpret one’s own behaviours and those of others in terms of underlying mental states, can have a protective effect on the individual. The present exploratory action research aimed to document the perceptions of members of this Inuit community regarding the particularities of the parent-child relationship. Two focus groups were conducted with community members, counsellors, and elders. A thematic analysis was done from the collected verbatims and guided by a phenomenological perspective. Factors extracted from the results were associated with well-being and suffering in the parent-child relationship and placed on a continuum. Openness and transmission were associated with well-being, while closure and a breakdown in communication were linked to suffering. Finally, this study highlights the relevance of focusing on mentalization among Inuit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".