MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415634588 · doi:10.1177/08404704251363911

The OnSPARK Data Platform: A Sector-Governed Infrastructure for Workforce Data for Planning and Quality Improvement in Long-Term Care

2025· article· en· W4415634588 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mary L. Miller, Jeff Poss, Jaimie Killingbeck, Arthur Sweetman, Andrew P. Costa

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaffingPayrollWorkforceWorkforce planningQuality (philosophy)Quality managementData collectionData quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Long-Term Care (LTC) sector in Canada faces persistent challenges in staffing, including limited data to support workforce planning, quality improvement, and policy evaluation. The OnSPARK Data Platform was established in 2023 as a sector-governed, province-wide infrastructure to address these challenges. OnSPARK aggregates de-identified electronic health records from over 200 LTC homes in Ontario, representing approximately one-third of the sector. Many homes also submit shift-level payroll and scheduling-based staffing data to be linked to facility unit-level quality metrics. Near real-time, unit-level insights are provided through an interactive portal, while aggregated data support embedded research, performance benchmarking, and policy simulation. This article introduces the structure and functionality of the OnSPARK platform, describes its unique approach to staffing data collection and use, and outlines its potential to generate operational, clinical, and policy-relevant insights. By enabling ongoing access to workforce and care data, OnSPARK supports a learning health system model that strengthens decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Management ForumSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207