Resource: A compendium of HLA types and expression in pediatric cancer models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment by leveraging the immune system to recognize and destroy tumor cells, offering a promising, less toxic option for pediatric patients. A key component of this response is antigen presentation, which depends on accurate human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing and expression. However, immune-focused resources for pediatric cancers remain limited. In this study, we present a comprehensive immunogenomic resource covering 231 cancer cell lines and 56 tumor-associated fibroblast cell lines from the Childhood Cancer Model Atlas (CCMA). We inferred high-resolution HLA types, predicted neoantigens arising from somatic single nucleotide variants, gene fusions, and splicing isoforms across multiple tumor types, and quantified HLA expression levels. We also explored immune escape mechanisms, including loss of heterozygosity and allele-specific expression loss of HLA genes. This publicly accessible dataset provides critical insight into the immune landscape of pediatric cancers and serves as a foundational tool for immunotherapy development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".