Joint Satellite Association and SFC Placement with Stability Optimization in LEO Satellite Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low Earth orbit (LEO) mega-constellations enable global, low-latency connectivity but challenge the security function chain (SFC) orchestration due to fast-changing visibility, resource volatility, and heterogeneous quality of service (QoS) requirements. To tackle this issue, we present in this paper SATStab, a stability-aware orchestration framework that co-designs: (i) stability-regularized objectives penalizing configuration churn across time windows; (ii) temporal decoupling with visibility-aware repair and warm starts; and (iii) hierarchical decoupling that separates fast association decisions from slower SFC placement and resource allocation. We formulate SATStab as a mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) problem and evaluate it with realistic LEO dynamics. We solve it through a two-stage approach, where in the first stage, we optimize satellite-user associations while in the second stage, we optimize SFC placements. Through extensive simulations, we show that, relative to a monolithic MINLP, SATStab reduces user-satellite handovers by 54.3%, satellite-ground station (GS) re-associations by 59.3%, and SFC migrations by 32.7%, while cutting solution time by 56.8% without degrading end-to-end (E2E) delay. These results prove the efficiency of SATStab in terms of resource orchestration and resilience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".