MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415646878 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1628794

Herbal medicine and acupuncture for mild cognitive impairment: a retrospective study of 2,242 for older adults in Republic of Korea

2025· article· en· W4415646878 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hyo-Weon Suh, Jae Hwan Lim, Jin-woo Suh, Chan Park, Yong-Sin Park, Sun-Yong Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKyung Hee University
KeywordsAcupunctureAlternative medicineDementiaRetrospective cohort studyCognitionRandomized controlled trialTraditional Chinese medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Dementia prevalence increases with age, underscoring the importance of early intervention for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, standard treatment recommendations for MCI remain lacking. Herbal medicine and acupuncture have been proposed as potential alternatives. This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of these interventions in patients with MCI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from a public health promotion program for community-dwelling older adults in Korea who received acupuncture, with or without herbal medicine, between 2021 and 2023. Feasibility was assessed by completion of acupuncture sessions and follow-up. Exact propensity score matching was performed using age, sex, comorbidities, depression scores, and health-related behaviors to compare herbal medicine add-on versus acupuncture only groups. Clinical outcomes included cognitive function [the Cognitive Impairment Screening Test (CIST) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)] and depression [Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (GDS-SF)]. Results: Of 5,525 participants, 4,623 received acupuncture with or without herbal medicine. Feasibility was high, with 86.4% completing planned acupuncture sessions; among these, 93.8% also received herbal medicine. Loss-to-follow-up rate was lower in the herbal medicine add-on (4.1%) than in the acupuncture-only (12.1%). After matching, 2,242 participants were included (2,044 herbal medicine add-on and 198 acupuncture-only). Both groups showed significant improvements in CIST, MoCA, and GDS-SF scores, with the herbal medicine add-on group demonstrating significantly greater cognitive improvement in the CIST (coefficient: 0.58; 95% CI, 0.10-1.08). Conclusion: Herbal medicine combined with acupuncture appeared feasible and potentially effective for managing MCI, supporting its practicality in community settings. However, its therapeutic benefits need to be further validated through rigorously designed randomized controlled trials. Long-term studies are warranted to confirm these findings and clarify their role in dementia prevention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicMedicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionFrench-language works237,207