Konformitas teori birokrasi Weber pada pembangunan fasilitas layanan ramah disabilitas di lingkungan Kanwil Kementerian Agama Provinsi Jawa Tengah
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bureaucratic reform is a government program that must be continuously implemented from the central to the regional levels. Bureaucratic reform is a process that necessitates change. One of the necessary changes is in the services provided to people with disabilities. To meet this change, reforms are implemented with an emphasis on rationality principles as articulated in Weber's bureaucratic theory. Background: The aim of this research is to describe and analyze the conformity of Weber's bureaucratic theory in the development of bureaucratic reform at the Regional Office of the Ministry of Religious Affairs in Central Java Province. Methods: This study employs a qualitative approach, using secondary data sources, and data analysis is conducted using a descriptive approach. Finding:Innovation in bureaucratic reform is conducted by prioritizing rationality, which involves analyzing resources with specific goals in mind. One necessary innovation is the improvement of service quality for people with disabilities, including those with visual impairments. Weber's bureaucratic theory aligns with the implementation of bureaucracy at the Regional Office of the Ministry of Religious Affairs in Central Java Province when supported by performance linearity from top to bottom, adapting to resources, and conducting activities based on problem solutions and anticipation. Supervision is carried out both horizontally and vertically to achieve work effectiveness and efficiency. Conclusion: The principle of rationality in Weber's bureaucratic theory is applicable and solution-oriented in the development of bureaucratic reform. Novelty/Originality of this article: The findings of this research present important principles from Weber's theory that have the potential to be applied in bureaucratic reform efforts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".