MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415650107 · doi:10.26522/ssj.v19i3.5122

“But isn’t it illegal?” Using Street Art to Engage Students on Issues of Social Justice

2025· article· en· W4415650107 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Anna Augusto Rodrigues

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Social Justice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Spaces through Art
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial justiceEconomic JusticeSocial mediaSocial innovationSocial activism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the past 15 years I have been researching and documenting, through photography and video, street art from different parts of the world.As a longtime educator whose teaching practice is rooted in the principles of equity, inclusion and cultural responsiveness, I regularly integrate street art in my courses when discussing issues of social justice.I have witnessed how this art form encourages learners of diverse ages and backgrounds to have in depth discussions on accessibility, racism, decolonization and related issues.I see how street art not only engages students but also opens pathways to difficult discussions.This is something I experienced personally when I was eight years old.At that age, I became aware of the importance of political freedom for the first time.I didn't learn about it in a classroom, or by reading a book, or from watching or listening to a news report.I learned about politics through messages posted anonymously on the walls and streets of a bustling city.In the summer of 1976, when I was visiting Lisbon, Portugal with my family, I first saw political street art.It was fanned out like the pages of a newspaper, providing information and personal opinions everywhere I looked.One image was painted and posted repeatedly: a red carnation.I remember a specific piece of street art on a wall at a busy intersection.It depicted a soldier with a rifle and a red carnation stuck in its barrel.There were no words with the art, but I remember thinking that it meant something important.I asked my parents, who were both Portuguese, what the message was communicating to the many people who were crossing paths with it daily.They explained that the red carnation, already a symbol associated with socialism in Portugal, was adopted during a revolution that started on April 25th, 1974.Known as "The Carnation Revolution," it led to the fall of a dictatorship and the installation of a democratic socialist government backed by ordinary citizens, who despite the risk of imprisonment took to the streets to support the risky coup started by a handful of low-ranking military officers.The dictatorship, which had been in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Social JusticeSame topicPublic Spaces through ArtFrench-language works237,207