MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Genesis of public-private partnership in foreign countries

2025· article· W4415659013 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. K. Vinogradova

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Project Management · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPublic-Private Partnership Projects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipState (computer science)Public–private partnershipPoliticsPrivate sectorPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents the historical development of one of the most important forms of interaction between state power and private enterprise in countries of the federal type – public-private partnership (hereinafter referred to as PPP). The following world powers came forward as research objects: the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the French Republic, Canada, and the United States of America. However, first of all, the authors of the article presented and disclosed the main terms and their characteristics, such as genesis, partnership ofthe state and business, and also analysed their own programmes aimed at the development of interaction of the state and private business (for example, Private Finance Initiative, Private Finance 2) as well as development centres (such as the global centre Partnerships United Kingdom, the federal coordination centre Mission D’appui aux Partenariats Public-privé (Fr. Mission of Support of PPP) and others. Accordingly, after conducting a historical analysis, it was established that, firstly, the role of the state in the implementation of PPP projects is decisive, as in most cases it is their initiator and main organiser, and, secondly, the basis of the construction and further development of this form of interaction is the formation of its institutional environment based on legal norms, specialised public authorities, the country’s political course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Project ManagementSame topicPublic-Private Partnership ProjectsFrench-language works237,207