MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415660644 · doi:10.1080/10749357.2025.2579912

Respiratory and functional status of inpatients with stroke: a cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4415660644 on OpenAlexaff
Steve Freitas Dos Santos, Joana Magano, Miguel P. Almeida

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespiratory systemDemographicsRehabilitationStroke (engine)Respiratory disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Respiratory function and functional status are often impaired after stroke, yet respiratory assessment before rehabilitation is frequently overlooked. Few studies explore these parameters in the acute and subacute phases, which are critical for recovery. Understandingtheir relationship may guide more effective rehabilitation.Objectives To characterize respiratory function and functional status in stroke inpatients at rehabilitation admission. Secondary objectives were to examine correlations between them, and to assess the influence of sex, age, comorbidities, body mass index, stroke type, and time since stroke on these correlations.Methods A cross-sectional study included stroke inpatients admitted to rehabilitation between 2023 and 2024. Demographics, Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP), Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP), Peak Cough Flow (PCF), Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) were collected.Results Eighty-four participants (67% male; 49% aged 60–69; 48% > 25 kg/m2; 70% ischemic stroke; 38 median days post-stroke) were included. Respiratory function was: MIP (median: 48.5 cmH2O; interquartile range [IQR]: 28.5;66), MEP (mean: 65.1 cmH2O; standard deviation [SD]: 26.1) and PCF (mean: 218.5 L/min; SD: 142.1), which were majorly below reference values, except for PCF. Functional status was as follows: FIM (median: 84; IQR: 70.75;93) and TIS (median: 14; IQR: 10.75;18). Correlation analysis showed weak correlation between PCF and FIM (R = 0.35) and TIS (R = 0.30), and moderate correlations between FIM and MIP (R = 0.47) and MEP (R = 0.42). Demographics and stroke subtypes did not significantly impact these correlations.Conclusions Respiratory and functional impairments are common early after stroke. Their significant correlation supports routine respiratory assessment at rehabilitation admission to guide individualized interventions, regardless of demographics or stroke subtypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Stroke RehabilitationSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207