Alexithymia tendencies in adolescents Sidoharjo Gunungkidul
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research was motivated by the increasing trend of Alexithymia among adolescents in Indonesia, including in some parts of the Gunung Kidul area. This research aimed to determine the level of Alexithymia tendency among groups of adolescents in Sidoharjo Village, Tepus District, based on gender. In addition, it also aimed to test empirically whether there is a difference in the tendency for Alexithymia in male and female adolescents. The hypothesis proposed in this research is that the tendency for Alexithymia in male adolescents in Sidoharjo Village is higher than in female adolescents. The sampling technique used in this research is proportional random sampling. The sample size was determined using the Slovin formula. Alexithymia scale was used as the measuring tool, prepared based on Nemiah's theory. The reliability of the measurement results obtained was 0.819. The results of this study show that the majority of Alexithymia tendencies in adolescents are in the moderate category, but 20.12% are in the high category, and 4.14% are in the very high category. Male adolescents have a higher tendency for Alexithymia (mean: 52.95) than female adolescents (mean: 47.25).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".