MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415665064 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1659024

Efficacy of health ecology-based health education on early rehabilitation outcomes in stroke patients

2025· article· en· W4415665064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chengcheng Zhu, C.L. Zhang, Min Zhang, Li‐Wei Wu, Jia Liu, Ting Zhang, Yingshu Kuai

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth Commission of Heilongjiang Province
KeywordsStroke (engine)Health educationIntervention (counseling)RehabilitationStroke recoveryFunction (biology)Virtuous circle and vicious circle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Stroke is a leading global cause of disability and mortality in adults, and early rehabilitation is critical for improving patients’ functional recovery and quality of life; however, conventional rehabilitation models often focus solely on medical interventions and overlook the impact of the patient’s comprehensive ecological environment on recovery, making it necessary to explore more holistic intervention approaches. To investigate the efficacy of health ecology theory-based health education in early stroke rehabilitation and its impacts on neurological/motor/cognitive function, psychological status, and metabolic biomarkers. Methods A total of 150 stroke patients during June–October 2024 were randomized into control and intervention groups based on interventions. Outcomes assessed included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for neurological deficit, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for motor function, Modified Barthel Index (MBI) for activities of daily living, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for cognition, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for psychological status, and metabolic biomarkers glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze path relationships among metabolic_indices, recovery_effect, and mental_status. Results The intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in NIHSS, FMA, MoCA, HbA1c, and LDL-C. Multivariate linear regression models showed moderate-to-substantial explanatory power, particularly for LDL-C and HbA1c (adjusted R 2 ≈ 30%). Although models for HADS and MBI had lower explanatory power, the intervention effect remained statistically significant ( p < 0.05). SEM revealed a significant positive path from mental_status to metabolic_indices ( β = 0.42). The negative path from recovery_effect to metabolic_indices (β = −0.45) signified that better recovery correlated with better metabolic profiles. A significant indirect effect of the intervention on metabolic_indices via improved mental_status was identified ( β = 1.00 × 0.42). Conclusion Health ecology-based health education effectively improves neurological/motor/cognitive function and metabolic control during early stroke rehabilitation. The intervention establishes a “physiological-psychological-social” virtuous cycle through multidimensional effects, providing an innovative framework for collaborative stroke recovery management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207