Silicon dust flames: A pathway to using silicon as a carbon-free energy carrier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Silicon is a promising energy carrier due to its abundance and energy density, which is comparable to aluminum and higher than that of iron. To date, research on silicon flames has primarily focused on addressing industrial safety concerns, often utilizing laboratory equipment unsuitable for fundamental combustion research. This work presents experiments with laminar silicon Bunsen dust flames, successfully stabilized for the first time using a newly redesigned McGill metal dust burner. The experiments are performed in 30%O 2 –70%N 2 and 40%O 2 –60%N 2 gas mixtures. The burning velocity of silicon flames, determined using the truncated cone method and particle image velocimetry (PIV), appears to be lower than that of aluminum flames but potentially comparable to that of iron flames of similar particle sizes. The flame temperature, estimated from the continuous flame spectra, is found to be a weak function of both fuel and oxygen concentrations due to the fact that a large fraction of the energy in the combustion zone is chemically stored in the SiO intermediate products. The formation of gaseous SiO during combustion is observed experimentally via the UV molecular spectra. Analysis of the combustion products reveals that they consist entirely of amorphous and spherical SiO 2 nanoparticles. The present study suggests that silicon particles primarily burn heterogeneously, during which most of the oxidation products form as intermediate gaseous SiO. This SiO further oxidizes into condensed SiO 2 upon cooling, ultimately forming nano-sized silica particles. Our work provides new data on silicon combustion, advancing the understanding of its feasibility as an alternative carbon-free energy carrier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".