MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415666409 · doi:10.1016/j.proci.2025.105940

Silicon dust flames: A pathway to using silicon as a carbon-free energy carrier

2025· article· en· W4415666409 on OpenAlex
Herman Heng, Cyril Mani, Natasha Chepel, Kartik Mangalvedhe, Elie Antar, Samuel Goroshin, Jeffrey M. Bergthorson

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Combustion Institute · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCanadian Space AgencyFoundation for Angelman Syndrome TherapeuticsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsSiliconCombustionParticle (ecology)AluminiumSilicon monoxideLaminar flowAmorphous siliconMonocrystalline siliconCrystalline silicon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silicon is a promising energy carrier due to its abundance and energy density, which is comparable to aluminum and higher than that of iron. To date, research on silicon flames has primarily focused on addressing industrial safety concerns, often utilizing laboratory equipment unsuitable for fundamental combustion research. This work presents experiments with laminar silicon Bunsen dust flames, successfully stabilized for the first time using a newly redesigned McGill metal dust burner. The experiments are performed in 30%O 2 –70%N 2 and 40%O 2 –60%N 2 gas mixtures. The burning velocity of silicon flames, determined using the truncated cone method and particle image velocimetry (PIV), appears to be lower than that of aluminum flames but potentially comparable to that of iron flames of similar particle sizes. The flame temperature, estimated from the continuous flame spectra, is found to be a weak function of both fuel and oxygen concentrations due to the fact that a large fraction of the energy in the combustion zone is chemically stored in the SiO intermediate products. The formation of gaseous SiO during combustion is observed experimentally via the UV molecular spectra. Analysis of the combustion products reveals that they consist entirely of amorphous and spherical SiO 2 nanoparticles. The present study suggests that silicon particles primarily burn heterogeneously, during which most of the oxidation products form as intermediate gaseous SiO. This SiO further oxidizes into condensed SiO 2 upon cooling, ultimately forming nano-sized silica particles. Our work provides new data on silicon combustion, advancing the understanding of its feasibility as an alternative carbon-free energy carrier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it