MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Seismic resilience of RC structures with shape memory alloys: Past and new perspectives

2025· article· en· W4415666883 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdul Azeez Mahamood, Faisal Mukhtar, M. Shahria Alam

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsSMA*Shape-memory alloyResilience (materials science)PseudoelasticityCLARITYStiffnessResidualEnergy (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review comprehensively investigates the role of shape memory alloys (SMAs) in enhancing the seismic resilience of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. Emphasizing the unique properties of SMAs, superelasticity (SE) and the shape memory effect (SME), the study classifies their applications across various RC elements, including beams, columns, shear walls, and beam-column joints. The review synthesizes findings from more than 100 experimental studies, detailing both internal and external SMA deployments, and highlights the performance metrics most relevant to seismic design: residual drift, energy dissipation, stiffness degradation, and load-carrying capacity. Distinct comparisons are drawn between Ni-Ti, Cu-based, and Fe-based SMAs, offering clarity on their context-specific advantages. A significant contribution of the study is the structured evaluation of hybrid systems that integrate SMAs with supplementary materials such as ECC, UHPC, and FRP, which demonstrate enhanced composite action and address SMA limitations such as low damping. The review identifies critical gaps in long-term performance data, implementation feasibility, and design standardization, and offers forward-looking recommendations for multi-material hybrid configurations, coupler development, and codification pathways. This work offers a consolidated reference point for researchers and practitioners seeking to advance the practical development of SMA-based solutions toward broader structural applications in seismic regions. By addressing key research gaps, the study advances the understanding of SMA applications in seismic engineering and outlines future directions for achieving resilient and sustainable RC structures. • Detailed review of SMA applications in RC structures for construction, retrofitting, and repair. • Seismic performance evaluation: energy dissipation, residual displacement, and self-centering. • Exploration of hybrid SMA-supplementary materials for optimized seismic resilience. • Identification of research gaps and recommendations for future SMA applications. • Practical insights for integrating SMAs into earthquake-resistant RC designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering StructuresSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207