MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415670174 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1861

The <scp>thesan-zoom</scp> project: central starbursts and inside-out quenching govern galaxy sizes in the early Universe

2025· article· en· W4415670174 on OpenAlexafffund
William McClymont, Sandro Tacchella, Aaron Smith, Rahul Kannan, Ewald Puchwein, Josh Borrow, Enrico Garaldi, Laura C. Keating, Mark Vogelsberger, Oliver Zier, Xuejian Shen, Filip Popovic

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersLeibniz-RechenzentrumScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGauss Centre for SupercomputingCanon Foundation in EuropeOsaka UniversityHarvard UniversityYork UniversityLeibniz-GemeinschaftNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGalaxyStar formationRedshiftStarsGalaxy formation and evolutionUniverseInterstellar mediumPower law

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We explore the evolution of galaxy sizes at high redshift ($3< z < 13$) using the high-resolution thesan-zoom radiation-hydrodynamics simulations, focusing on the mass range of $10^6\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot } < \mathit{M}_{\ast } < 10^{10}\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$. Our analysis reveals that galaxy size growth is tightly coupled to bursty star formation. Galaxies above the star-forming main sequence tend to form stars in a central starburst, which decreases their radial size. These galaxies quench inside-out, causing spatially extended star formation and increasing their radial size, leading to oscillatory behaviour around the size–mass relation. Notably, we find a positive intrinsic size–mass relation at high redshift, consistent with observations but in tension with large-volume simulations. We attribute this discrepancy to the bursty star formation captured by our multiphase interstellar medium framework, but missing from simulations using the effective equation-of-state approach with hydrodynamically decoupled feedback. We also find that the normalization of the size–mass relation follows a double power law as a function of redshift, with a break at $z\approx 6$, because the majority of galaxies at $z>6$ show rising star-formation histories, and therefore are in a compaction phase. We demonstrate that H $\alpha$ emission is systematically extended relative to the UV continuum by a median factor of 1.7, consistent with recent James Webb Space Telescope studies. However, in contrast to previous interpretations that link extended H $\alpha$ sizes to inside-out growth, we find that Lyman-continuum (LyC) emission is spatially disconnected from H $\alpha$. Instead, a simple Strömgren sphere argument reproduces observed trends, suggesting that extreme LyC production during central starbursts is the primary driver of extended nebular emission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→