Perfectionism as a mediator between obsessive-compulsive symptoms and overcontrolling parenting in autism spectrum disorder families
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective This study investigated whether perfectionism mediates the relationship between obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms and overcontrolling parenting attitudes among parents of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 198 parents (74.7% mothers, 25.3% fathers) of individuals aged 3–30 years with ASD in Istanbul, Turkey. Data were collected using the Vancouver Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, and Parental Attitudes and Child Rearing Scale. Mediation analysis was performed using PROCESS macro.Results Positive correlations were found between OC symptoms and perfectionism (r = 0.49, p < 0.01) and between OC symptoms and overcontrolling parenting (r = 0.25, p < 0.01). Perfectionism showed evidence of mediating the relationship between OC symptoms and overcontrolling parenting attitudes (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.00, 0.03]).Conclusions Perfectionism may mediate the relationship between OC symptoms and overcontrolling parenting in ASD families. Interventions targeting perfectionism may potentially reduce overcontrolling parenting approaches in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".