MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415677536 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2025-0161

Eastern hemlock ( <i>Tsuga canadensis</i> ) as an alternate host for spruce budworm ( <i>Choristoneura fumiferana)</i> : dendrochronological evidence from Maine, USA

2025· article· en· W4415677536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rachel Poppe, S. P. Birch, Christopher H. Guiterman, Laura S. Kenefic, Evan R. Larson, David A. Orwig, Neil Pederson, Shawn Fraver

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Forest ServiceNorthern Research StationMaine Agricultural and Forest Experiment StationU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSpruce budwormTsugaBalsamChoristoneura fumiferanaAbies balsameaWestern HemlockHost (biology)Picea abies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In northeastern North America, episodic eastern spruce budworm ( Choristoneura fumiferana) outbreaks extensively defoliate balsam fir ( Abies balsamea) and spruces ( Picea glauca, Picea rubens, Picea mariana). We investigated eastern spruce budworm defoliation in eastern hemlock ( Tsuga canadensis), a reported alternate host species, during previously documented outbreaks in Maine, USA. We compiled red spruce and hemlock tree-ring series from nine sites, seven of which showed synchronous radial growth reductions in spruce and hemlock during documented budworm outbreaks. Outbreak evidence varied among sites, but growth reductions were observed in six study sites during a 1914 outbreak. Synchronous growth reductions between spruce and hemlock suggest that when budworm defoliation occurred in spruce at a given site, hemlock typically experienced at least some level of defoliation. Relative budbreak synchrony with preferred host species may contribute to hemlock's suitability as a host. This research is timely given the recent spruce budworm population increase in this region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest Research→Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→