MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415678246 · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ae1936

Glacier calving and moraine collapse triggered the glacial lake outburst flood in South Lhonak Lake, Indian Himalaya

2025· article· en· W4415678246 on OpenAlexaff
S. N. Remya, Vishnu Nandan, Atanu Bhattacharya, Pradeep Srinivasalu, Kriti Mukherjee, John Yackel, Tobias Bolch

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsMoraineGlacierGlacial periodGlacial lakeFlood mythIce calvingTidewater glacier cycleTerminal moraine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) are destructive and threaten downstream communities in the Himalaya. Through satellite image analysis, we investigate the 2023 GLOF event at South Lhonak Lake, Sikkim, India, focusing on the lake’s historical evolution and the geomorphic controls that caused the GLOF. Multi-temporal data from 10 satellite missions revealed a significant increase in glacier surface lowering from −0.19 m year −1 (1970–1983) to −0.87 m year −1 (2015–2023). Initially a supraglacial lake in 1962, it evolved into a moraine-dammed lake by 1983 and expanded 12-fold from 0.11 km 2 (1962) to 1.4 km 2 (2023). Between 27 September and 6 October 2023, satellite imagery revealed an unusually strong retreat of 49.6 ± 7.1 m, indicating glacier calving and presence of massive icebergs visible on the lake. Our analysis shows 7 large glacier retreat and calving events between 2017 and 2023, further weakening the lateral moraines. This, combined with intermittent rainfall triggered the moraine dam collapse, leading to the GLOF. These findings emphasize the need for long-term monitoring of Himalayan glacial lakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research CommunicationsSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207