MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415678560 · doi:10.1201/9781003521525-4

From innovation to implementation

2025· book-chapter· en· W4415678560 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Suganya, E. Prema, Melissa Lynch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIntellectual Property and Patents
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRIPS architectureSustainable developmentExternalitySustainabilityGreen economyIntellectual propertyGreen innovation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an era marked by escalating environmental concerns, the role of green technology and patents in fostering sustainable innovation has gained significant attention. Green patents, encompassing a broad range of technologies aimed at reducing environmental impact, are pivotal in driving the transition toward a more sustainable future. However, the patent system presents a complex challenge, balancing the need to incentivize innovation with the imperative of ensuring broad accessibility to these critical technologies. This research examines the contribution of green patents to sustainable innovation and the global adoption of eco-friendly technologies. It explores the double externality problem, which arises from the tension between environmental protection and economic growth in green technology innovation. This study also investigates the effectiveness of fast-track patent examination programs implemented by various countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, and India, in accelerating the development and dissemination of green technologies. Key finding reveals that while these fast-track initiatives have successfully encouraged the development of green technologies, the current patent system still poses significant challenges, particularly in terms of accessibility and dissemination. The research highlights the need for more flexible international legal frameworks, such as those provided by the TRIPS Agreement and the Doha Declaration, to better support the global spread of green technologies. The study concludes that a more balanced approach is required, combining robust patent protection with mechanisms that ensure broader accessibility. Strengthening global collaboration on patent laws, promoting open access to green technologies, and encouraging public-private partnerships are crucial steps toward achieving this balance. By addressing these issues, the global community can better leverage green patents to drive sustainable innovation and address the pressing environmental challenges of our time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.015
Scholarly communication0.0160.015
Open science0.0030.016
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntellectual Property and PatentsFrench-language works237,207