MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415679831 · doi:10.3390/rs17213576

SLA-Net: A Novel Sea–Land Aware Network for Accurate SAR Ship Detection Guided by Hierarchical Attention Mechanism

2025· article· en· W4415679831 on OpenAlex
Han Ke, Xiao Ke, Zishuo Zhang, Xiangyu Chen, Xiaowo Xu, Tianwen Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarSegmentationFocus (optics)Feature (linguistics)Perspective (graphical)Mechanism (biology)Fusion mechanism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, deep learning (DL)-based synthetic aperture radar (SAR) ship detection has made significant strides. However, many existing DL-based SAR ship detection methods treat sea regions and land regions equally, failing to be fully aware of the differences between the two regions during training and testing. This oversight may prevent the network’s attention from fully concentrating on valuable regions (i.e., sea regions and ship regions), thereby adversely affecting overall detection accuracy. To address these issues, we propose the Sea–Land Aware Net (SLA-Net), which introduces a novel SLA Hierarchical Attention mechanism to gradually focus the network’s attention on sea and ship regions across different stages. Specifically, SLA-Net instantiates the SLA Hierarchical Attention mechanism through three components: the SLA Sea-Attention Backbone, which incorporates sea attention in the feature extraction stage; the SLA Ship-Attention FPN, which implements ship attention in the feature fusion stage; and the SLA Ship-Attention Detection Heads, which enforce ship attention in the detection refinement stage. Moreover, to tackle the lack of sea–land priors in the community working on DL-based SAR ship detection, we introduce the sea–land segmentation dataset for SSDD (SL-SSDD). Built upon the well-established SAR ship detection dataset (SSDD), it serves as a synergistic dataset for ship detection when used in conjunction with SSDD. Quantitative experimental results on SSDD and generalization results on HRSID and LS-SSDD demonstrate that SLA-Net achieves superior SAR ship detection performance compared to other methods. Furthermore, SL-SSDD, which contains sea–land segmentation information, can provide a new perspective for the community working on DL-based SAR ship detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it